Why do systems establish? Why do systems fail? Why do systems change? What are the chances of the solution?

“Sihanouk Dipo”

Executive Summary

Why do systems establish? and why do systems fail?

legitimate questions are being asking about the current situation, which is going inside the Middle East. It is not right to be in doubt for one moment that they are not exist, or they are not interested in asking about the current situation of the many crises. As these questions are relevant today more than any day and any moment to the Syrian situation in the (overthrow of Aleppo), as the second Syrian-line described; authoritarian opposition line that break down today, or(liberation of Aleppo) as the first-line members with their supporters said. Or, as described by  the third one/ secularism democratic opposition line that described it as (a new balance is required),giving the benefit to the next stage. Only, to thing that Syria today and the future will resemble to the Syria before 2011 are considered in its lowest heresy and abnormally thinking, which the normal situation and subject to the survival of Syria related to democratic change. All of these stages we are living will be different from its predecessor.

It will be very useful to focus on Syria – the most important example of the crisis in the Middle East; the great question with a complicated answer: Why do systems change? And why do they should change? Especially if we realized that the answer is related to the society and  communal nature that show evolution moral and political circumstance. It can’t basically talk about a society without ethics and politics; even been found; it would be just an useless monster or just like gelatinous Rubble. Such Rubble has just one job which is to be obedient servant to other communities; just as a tool in the hands of the others and ruling regimes inside the Middle East, especially that found itself faced with the issue like the Kurdish issue; which do not realize that the political regimes must be since the beginning of the management (not authority) for the community to what the social nature composed them these communities. May be They aware of, but do not find themselves involved in this. they are just a tool in the hands of authoritarian erected on the dorsolateral societies and cultures of the Middle East.

The total solution

What had been published by the back of the briefings for Aleppo; The observer easily got the superficiality in terms of analysis and palaces proceedings and the narrow power of ideology advertising . Each analysis has sectarian polt (Sunni or Shiite). They are considered at their best; serve their agendas, in addition to the performance of the large size of the actual fueling hatred and division after the hidden partition. As such interpretations are considered another down in the bottoms after multiple crises remarkable passage of decline and underdevelopment in the Middle East. The network intake between the Syrian crisis with the crises in the region is not uptaken continued effort to the decision in international politics, but the totally issue return to the nature of the Middle East and the systemic crisis in the Middle East. The definition, that it is only one crisis in turn consists of a total of crises. The crisis in Syria, the crisis in Turkey, and throughout this region in crisis. Especially if we realized the  destruction of Basra and all the cities, that the nation-state system is seen today that worst of all the regimes in the age of Middle East this of bringing the destruction to the culture of the regions and provinces of this region, and the nation-state that has been arrested from the east to the West, the latter which he found an opportunity solution. It was already well and truly, and the nation-state system appeared in the West advanced state ended the sectarian conflict that plunged Europe in the age of darkness; but in the Middle it has drown in a sea of blood and sleep fragmentation and to the communities and the phenomena under belligerent nationalism. Across geographies withheld developed nation-states after the Sykes-Picot show today that she was Foundation Incubator conflict communities are advanced for any period. After what these countries have worked to erase the effects of all the advantages identities of regionalism and regional historical society of the Middle East itself. Turkish, Arabic and Persian nation-states and look virtue failed, and in their failing we find the solution, and in resolving the reasons of failing, we find the establishment and evolution towards decentralized administrations, without being regionalism and regional administrations opposed by about semi-independently on wider ranges. Peoples, cultures and beliefs of the Middle East is also able to call the desired stage as the stage of history of working primarily identities interregional, and will be the standard power of any system on the basis of measuring and comparing the extent of quasi-democratic independence regionalism and regional areas owned by force. It is important to mention here that all UN relevant resolutions of the Syrian crisis; the start of the UN resolution called statement in Geneva in June 2012 and up to the decision in 2254 and the two did not touch the core of a solution for Democratic Change in Syria have not been able to establish security and stability, steadfast; but It may be the purpose of a cease-fire and confined in the end to provide humanitarian assistance in areas of tension. Despite the importance of this destination, but it is not enough and can’t do to achieve advancement. The advancement is followed by a minute to read the Syrian social nature; the fact that this nature Total identities absent in Syria, and the denial of the nation-state them, and it seeks to establish itself such as the rule typical single individual alone, but it is linked to definitely domination system and exploitation associated with them, responsible for what has happened in Syria.

History records that of the year 1555 and even in 1918 and signed both countries Safavid and Ottoman 18 agreements. Qasr-e Shirin Agreement was one of them, east of Kirkuk dated May 17 – May 1639 , which both of them gave up for parts to each other, but without result of all these agreements to stop the war between them. Turkey today is no different from the old Ottoman; it perpetuated; through all the (agreements) held by either with or with Iran, Russia It is without a position to have a solution that suits them, and even more no solution. Turkey, as any authoritarian regime in the Middle East realizes that they are resistant to change. Any change happen go by, be sure that all these systems are going; and the issue she went unbearable desire and passion, but its relationship in Regional province in the culture of the Middle East firmly on the identity and the private law at all stages of history, but it brings us to the question: What did the Kurdish, Syriac and Assyrian still continue, why remained beliefs … although the magnitude of the systematic policy towards disruption aim to destroy and dissolve?

Summary solution; Al-Ocalania is the solution

It seems that the interview with Mr. Nechirvan Barzani, the independence of the Kurdistan Regional Conference at the American University in Dohuk several days before the newly hollow has no political value; it is considerable only huge propaganda value. It seems contradictory with the same idea, destroying any idea of the independence value. Each independence history had freedom and democracy. Without them and be the talk of independence like a determination to make more geographic intended colony. In the case of Iraq’s Kurdistan region / Pachauri Kurdistan seems to prepare the transition to manifest in making Iraq’s Kurdistan region Turkish colony, while the revolutionary phenomenon in Bakori Kurdistan / southeast Turkey and across Turkey indicate that change is coming to Turkey, in particular with the facts that appear in the international policy toward the region. Has the social nature of Kurdish in Kurdistan got its freedom? Is there an appreciable democracy in the political life in this region acquired the legitimacy of the UN and the legal since the fourth century? Aren’t we today in front of two different regions in the same region?

Many questions pile up in front of the parliament, which seems like it might wax (Democrat) in the face of four other parties involved days of this Parliament. Who is the dictatorship and who is the democratic; Mr. Nechirvan Barzani?

Ocalan says in its folder IV, entitled: Manifesto of democratic civilization, the civil crisis and solving the democratic civilization in the Middle East: (From here, for each system provided with the opportunity solution in the Middle East that the foremost accounting ideological successful Qomoia, Dinoia, sexism and scientism situation. in terms of practical politics, he should make a space for the activity of a democratic society is centered around the state in line with the riches bumper. I am not talking about the tendency hollow of civil society. it is important recognition that the real local culture of democracy is necessary as much as bread, water and air. It should be developed in accordance with this awareness. The salvation of the individual-centered culture of power and state that is attracted as a magnet, it is the first job must be completed successfully. Where, this ongoing tradition for thousands of years is the main obstacle on the path of democratic culture. therefore, our main motto must be as follows: There is no a social activity most valuable, better and more desirable from a democratic society activities).

We notice through this revolutionary conclusion to the nature of community solution in the Middle East, that Aloocalania examined thoroughly reservoirs the error and collapse in the Middle East. All authoritarian systems today seem common and united in the ways of the tracks authoritarian including perpetrated from the enslavement and the exclusion of women in society; all of which regard women as mere flesh, trademark and limited to the functions of limited entrenched system slave, and the authoritarian regimes find in nationalism right to exercise servitude or superiority over other nationalities. As, it blows in the bladders of religious extremism and differentiation practitioner differential religions to a degree of up to atone other and questioning the beliefs of the other account.

These are the reasons of collapse of Syria, the same reasons for the collapse of Turkey, and every totalitarian regime in this collapsed Middle East.

According to that we are living today, the idea and philosophy of the democratic nation seems to be a true solution to crises in the Middle East. The crisis and the Syrian war are in the forefront of these crises, and move it to the armed democratic way, because this nation is considered mainly: accounting ideological successful Qomoia, Dinoia, sexism and scientism situation.